Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Microsoft Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 13, 2002No. C8-01-701PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL H. ANDERSON, Justice.
Microsoft Corporation appeals from a decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals denying discretionary review under Minn. R. Civ.App. P. 105.01. More particularly, Microsoft asserts that the court of appeals improperly denied review of a district court order granting class certification under Minn. R. Civ. P. 23. We affirm.
On May 3, 2000, respondent Daniel Gordon commenced an action against Microsoft in Hennepin County District Court on behalf of himself and others similarly situ ated. Gordon claimed that Microsoft violated Minnesota’s antitrust law. In the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Blair v. Equifax Check Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- In Re Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Thompson v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Aten v. Scottsdale InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Lennar Corp. v. Great American Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
- Lorix v. Crompton Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re GlaxoSmithKline PlcSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Architex Ass'n, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.