Siewert v. Northern States Power Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The district court denied Northern States Power’s (NSP) motion for summary judgment on Harlan Siewert and Greg Sie-wert’s common-law claims alleging damages and requesting injunctive relief from the effects of stray voltage on their dairy cows. Following NSP’s initial appeal from the denial of summary judgment, the district court certified, as important and doubtful, questions on whether the Sie-werts’ action is barred by the filed-rate doctrine, the primary-jurisdiction doctrine, or the statute of repose for improvements to real property. We conclude that neither the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Central Office Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Lietz v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Edgewater Motels, Inc. v. GatzkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Mahowald v. Minnesota Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Siewert v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Winner Bros. v. Seitz Electric, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Erdman v. Life Time Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Persigehl v. Ridgebrook Investments Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Brown v. UNITED WATER DELAWARE INC.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.