Legal Opinion
Hendricks v. Starkist Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 25, 2014No. Case No.: 13-cv-729 YGRPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Motion to Dismiss; Denying Motion For Leave To File Amicus Declaration
(Dkt. No. 21, 32)
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Plaintiff Patrick Hendricks brings this putative class action against Defendant *922StarKist Co. (“Starkist”). Plaintiff seeks monetary damages and injunctive relief on the grounds that four of StarKist’s canned tuna products are underfilled and, thus, substantially underweight. Plaintiff alleges claims for breach of express and implied warranties (Counts I, II, and III), unjust enrichment (Count IV), negligent…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Weisblum v. Prophase Labs, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Strumlauf v. Starbucks Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- In re Trader Joe's Tuna Litig.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.