Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Trader Joe's Tuna Litig.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 3, 2017No. Case No. 2:16–cv–01371–ODW(AJWx)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants Trader Joe's Company and Trader Joe's East Inc. (collectively, "Trader Joe's") move to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") on several bases. (ECF No. 55.) On June 2, 2017, the Court granted Trader Joe's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), with leave to amend. (ECF No. 54.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS, IN PART, and DENIES, IN PART, Trader Joe's Motion.

II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs allege a consumer class action relating to Trader Joe's allegedly illegal *1080…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Patane v. Nestlé Waters N. Am., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
  2. Patane v. Nestlé Waters N. Am., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
  3. Rojas v. Bosch Solar Energy Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Barboza v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. Brown v. Starbucks CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API