Strumlauf v. Starbucks Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS
THELTON E. HENDERSON, United States District Judge
This matter came before the Court on June 1,2016, on Defendant Starbucks Corporation’s motions to dismiss Plaintiffs Si-era' Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles’ Class Action Complaint. Having carefully considered the parties written and oral arguments, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court now GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motions.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Siera Strumlauf and Benjamin Robles (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed their Class Action Complaint…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Byler v. Deluxe Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2016
- In re Trader Joe's Tuna Litig.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
- In re Apple Processor Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Hawes v. Macy's Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.