Legal Opinion

Weisblum v. Prophase Labs, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 20, 2015No. 14-CV-3587 (JMF)PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Eli Weisblum and James Loren Gibbs bring this putative consumer class action against Prophase Labs, Inc. (“Prophase”) and its Chief Executive Officer, Theodore W. Karkus (together with Prophase, “Defendants”), alleging various federal and state claims arising out of their marketing and sale of Cold-EEZE cold remedy products (“Cold-EEZE”). At bottom, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants made false representations in marketing Cold-EEZE as effective in reducing the duration and severity of the common cold. Defendants move to dismiss the…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Buonasera v. Honest Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  3. In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  4. Casey v. Odwalla, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. Brady v. Basic Research, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API