Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Re: Dkt. No. 63
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Stephen Hadley (“Plaintiff”) brings the instant suit against Defendant Kellogg Sales Company (“Defendant”) for allegedly misleading statements on Defendant’s food product packaging. Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 63 (“Mot.”). Having considered the parties’ briefing, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
*1059I. BACKGROUND
A.…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Geffner v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Ahern v. Apple Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Alvarez v. NBTY, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Beaudry v. The NOCO Company, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Broussard v. Dole Packaged Foods, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.