Legal Opinion

Watkins v. City of Wilmington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 17, 1976No. 90PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

On appeal, defendants assign as error the deputy commissioner’s Findings of Fact Nos. 6, 7, 8 and 9 for the reason that they were not supported by competent evidence. In reviewing the findings found by a deputy commissioner or by an individual member of the Commission when acting as a hearing commissioner, the Commission may review, modify, adopt, or reject the findings of fact found by the hearing commissioner. The Commission is the fact-finding body under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Lee v. Henderson & Associates, 284 N.C. 126, 200 S.E. 2d 32 (1973); Brewer v. Trucking…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Henry v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Guest v. Brenner Iron & Metal CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Johnson v. Asheville Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Peoples v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Deese v. Champion International Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Hendrix v. Linn-Corriher Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API