Legal Opinion

Bonnett v. Custer Lumber Corp.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1995No. 18760PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

In this appeal it is asserted that the South Dakota Department of Labor (Department) and the trial court erred in denying a claimant permanent total disability benefits under the odd-lot doctrine. We affirm.

FACTS

On June 25, 1987, Randy Bonnett (Bon-nett) injured his left leg while working for Custer Lumber Corporation (Custer Lumber). Ultimately, his treating physician restricted his work activities to “no standing or walking more than three hours in an eight hour shift and no lifting greater than 50 pounds.” Custer Lumber’s worker’s compensation carrier, Cigna Property…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of Northwestern Bell Tel. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lawler v. Windmill RestaurantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hanson v. Penrod Construction Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Petersen v. Hinky DinkySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kennedy v. Hubbard Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wagaman v. Sioux Falls ConstructionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tischler v. United Parcel ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Kurtz v. SCISouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Kester v. Colonial Manor of CusterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Zoss v. United Building Centers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API