Legal Opinion
Tischler v. United Parcel Service
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Tischler appeals as inadequate her workers’ compensation impairment rating, the chiropractic and medical expenses, and costs. UPS filed notice of review challenging liability, permanent partial disability benefits, prejudgment interest, penalty, and the finding that Tischler’s condition was not aggravated during employment with Rapid City (City). We affirm all issues except that we reverse issue 8 (penalty), the second part of issue 5 (permanent partial disability benefits) and remand for recalculation that part of issue 7 on prejudgment interest.
FACTS
[¶ 2] Tischler…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Caldwell v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Wagaman v. Sioux Falls ConstructionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Kester v. Colonial Manor of CusterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- South Dakota Public Entity Pool for Liability v. WingerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Zoss v. United Building Centers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Darling v. West River Masonry, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.