Legal Opinion
Petersen v. Hinky Dinky
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1994No. 18281PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOVRIEN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by David D. Petersen (Petersen) from a judgment of the circuit court wherein it affirmed a decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor, Division of Labor and Management (Department), in favor of Hinky Dinky (Employer) and its worker’s compensation carrier, INA/CIGNA (Insurer), denying Petersen’s claim for a permanent total disability rating under the odd-lot doctrine. We affirm.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Petersen’s claim was first heard by the Department in September of 1987. The Department rendered its decision in June of 1988, and issued a preliminary…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Permann v. South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance DivisionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Day v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Application of SDDS, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Lawler v. Windmill RestaurantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Sopko v. C & R Transfer Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Schuck v. John Morrell & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Wagaman v. Sioux Falls ConstructionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Loewen v. Hyman Freightways, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Enger v. FMCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.