Legal Opinion
New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1994No. A058609PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
New Haven Unified School District (School District), the plaintiff in an action to condemn a leasehold interest in Union City, California, appeals from a judgment awarding compensation to the lessee, Taco Bell Corporation (Taco Bell).
In 1989, School District announced plans to expand a high school within its jurisdiction by acquiring an adjacent shopping center along Alvarado Niles Road, a principal thoroughfare of Union City. Later that year, it filed a complaint in eminent domain against the owner of the shopping center, Howard Van Orden, Jr., and each of the tenants,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Pasadena v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Gardena v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Morey v. VannucciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- City of El Cajon v. El Cajon Police Officers' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- County of Clark v. Sun State Properties, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.