Legal Opinion

City of Pasadena v. Porter

California Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 8962PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

The City of Pasadena instituted proceedings under the Street Opening Act of 1903, as amended, to open, widen, and extend Garfield Avenue from Colorado Street southerly to Green Street. The defendant, Anna G. Porter, owns one of the parcels of land affected by the proceedings, and the respondent, Gekco Company, is the owner of a lease for years, executed by her, of a store building located on the land, and having a frontage of 35 feet on Colorado Street. The portion of the land sought to be taken includes 8.3 feet of the frontage of the store premises. Beferees appointed by the trial court on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Corrigan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Gluck v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. LatrobeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  5. Stubbings v. Village of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Desert Waters, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People Ex Rel. Korzen v. American Airlines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Texas Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Noble v. TweedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API