Legal Opinion
Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 2010No. 09-16942PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
Who knew that simple math could be so tricky? The parties to this dispute, the State of California and two California Indian tribes, signed Gaming Compacts intend ed “to initiate a new era of tribal-state cooperation” with respect to gaming in the state. Central to the Compacts is a formula to calculate the number of gaming devices California tribes are permitted to license. How to interpret this opaquely drafted and convoluted formula has preoccupied the parties for some time, as the result has significant economic implications. Indeed, math and money have led to a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Wolf v. Walt Disney Pictures and TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Tohono O'Odham NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- ASARCO, LLC v. Celanese Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Teamsters, Local 396 v. Nasa Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Promega Corp. v. Life Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.