Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

County of Clark v. Sun State Properties, Ltd.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2003No. 35856PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Rose, J.:

In this appeal, we consider the proper procedure for determining just compensation in an eminent domain action when there are various interests involved in the condemned property. We hold that the eminent domain statutes codified the undivided-fee rule, which requires the court to first determine the value of the property as a whole, and in a subsequent hearing, to apportion the award among the various interests. Accordingly, we conclude that the district court erred when it first valued the various interests in order to determine the just compensation for the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. United States v. 50 Acres of LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Ges, Inc. v. CorbittNevada Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Eagle Lake Improvement Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HeerNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Edelstein v. Bank of New York MellonNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. International Game Technology, Inc. v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. McCarran International Airport v. SisolakNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Teriano v. Nevada State BankNevada Supreme Court · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API