County of San Diego v. Miller
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CLARK, J.
We determine whether the owner of an unexercised option to purchase real property has a right to compensation when the optioned property is taken through the power of eminent domain.
For valuable consideration, appellant acquired an option to purchase property. However, before the option had been exercised, respondent county filed a condemnation action to acquire the land. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1237 et seq.) Appellant filed an answer in the action (Code Civ. Proc., § 1246), alleging the existence of his option and seeking compensation to the extent the land’s fair market value…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Pro-Eco, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners of Jay County, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.