Legal Opinion

City of Gardena v. Camp

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1977No. Civ. 48498PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, J.

Following judgment in a condemnation action, defendants made a timely motion for award of attorneys’ and expert witness’ (appraiser’s) fees under former Code of Civil Procedure section 1249.3. The motion was denied. They appeal from order denying the motion.

On January 9, 1974, the City of Gardena (City) filed a complaint in eminent domain to condemn for street widening purposes a portion of defendant’s property, a 10-foot wide strip of land, part of a larger parcel. Pursuant to court order, the City took immediate possession of the property.,A.t a final pretrial conference on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. County of Los Angeles v. KranzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. City of Los Angeles v. CannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. YukiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. San Diego Metro. Transit Dev. Bd. v. CushmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. DaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API