Legal Opinion

Grenier v. City of Irwindale

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1997No. B102909PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIGNON, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Arthur Grenier appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendant and respondent City of Irwindale in this action for dangerous condition of public property with respect to a flooded street. We conclude the city has established the defense of design immunity under Government Code section 830.6. A public entity defendant establishes design immunity for purposes of summary judgment when it presents substantial evidence of the reasonableness of the design, even if conflicting evidence of the design’s reasonableness is presented by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Baldwin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Iverson v. Muroc Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Cameron v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Mozzetti v. City of BrisbaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Cornette v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Laabs v. City of VictorvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Harustak v. WilkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Pacific Bell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Alvarez v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API