Legal Opinion
Mozzetti v. City of Brisbane
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 1977No. Civ. 38589PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KANE, J.
Defendants City of Brisbane and Milton S. Hetzel appeal from the trial court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict awarding respondents damages in the sum of $75,000.
Viewing the evidence in favor of the judgment, as we must, it appears that the controversy at hand arose from flood damage to respondents’ property located in the City of Brisbane, California. The property consists of a 40-unit motel, a 27-unit trailer park, and a storage building, and is bounded on the east by Old County Road, on the north by Visitación Mall, and on the south by San Francisco Avenue. Because heavy…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Baldwin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Green v. General Petroleum Corp.California Supreme Court · 1928
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Las Palmas Associates v. Las Palmas Center AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Aas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Navellier v. SlettenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.