Legal Opinion

Cornette v. Department of Transportation

California Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 2001No. S089010PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

A public entity is liable for injury proximately caused by a dangerous condition of its property if the dangerous condition created a reasonably foreseeable risk of the kind of injury sustained, and the public entity had actual or constructive notice of the condition a sufficient time before the injury to have taken preventive measures. (Gov. Code, § 835, subd. (b); Baldwin v. State of California (1972) 6 Cal.3d 424, 427 [99 Cal.Rptr. 145, 491 P.2d 1121] (Baldwin).)

However, a public entity may avoid such liability by raising the affirmative defense of design immunity. (§…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Weiss v. FoteNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mountain Air Enters., LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Laabs v. City of VictorvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Klein v. United StatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Hampton v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API