Legal Opinion

Pacific Bell v. City of San Diego

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 2000No. D033640PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MCDONALD, J.

Plaintiff Pacific Bell’s facility suffered substantial damage when a corroded cast-iron water pipe servicing a fire hydrant burst and the escaping water flooded the facility. The pipe was owned and maintained by defendant City of San Diego (City) and would not have burst had it not been corroded.

Pacific Bell sought inverse condemnation damages from City. Pacific Bell asserted that because City had no preventive maintenance plan to inspect or monitor the effect of corrosion on old cast iron pipes, burst pipes resulting in damage to adjoining private property was an…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Arreola v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Goebel v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Knutson v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API