Legal Opinion

McCall v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 24, 2004No. 3803PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

This suit arises as a result of an insurance dispute. Appellant contends her late husband’s automobile insurance policy either contained an automobile death indemnity provision or would have if not for Respondents’ negligence. The circuit court granted Respondents’ motion for summary judgment as to the South Carolina parties and applied the South Carolina door closing statute to dismiss the case. We affirm as modified. 1

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Brian and Jill McCall lived in North Carolina and had a State Farm automobile insurance policy, which contained an automobile death indemnity…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Staubes v. City of Folly BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rife v. Hitachi Const. MacHinery Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  2. Moore v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  3. Singleton v. ShererCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
  5. Mulherin-Howell v. CobbCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API