Legal Opinion
Wilder Corp. v. Wilke
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 9, 1998No. 24770PublishedCited by 206 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TOAL, Justice:
This case involves the foreclosure of a bond for title. Respondent, Wilder Corporation (“Seller”), brought this foreclosure action against petitioners, Klaus and Rita Wilke (“Buyer”), as a result of Buyer’s indebtedness arising out of the sale of property. The master-in-equity found in favor of Buyer. The Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part. Buyer appeals the Court of Appeals’ decision. We affirm.
Factual/Procedural Background
In 1979, Seller agreed to sell its mobile home park to Buyer in exchange for Buyer’s motel and the additional sum of $635,000. On January…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife & Marine Resources DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Hubbard v. RoweSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Broom Ex Rel. Broom v. Southeastern Highway Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
- Graham v. BurgissSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by206 opinions
- Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Atlantic Coast Builders & Contractors, LLC v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- RFT Management Co. v. Tinsley & Adams L.L.P.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- State v. ForresterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.