Legal Opinion
Tupper v. Dorchester County
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 30, 1997No. 24643PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLER, Justice:
These are cross-appeals from an order of the circuit court granting Respondents-Appellants (The Tuppers) summary judgment and holding they had an easement over property owned by Appellant-Respondent (Suggs). The court issued an injunction requiring Suggs to remove an inground swimming pool built over the easement. The Court also granted summary judgment to Respondent, Town of Summerville, finding that it was not liable to the Tuppers for having granted a swimming pool permit to Suggs. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
The Tuppers own 400 acres of property…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Gilliland v. Elmwood PropertiesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. MARINE CONTRACTING AND TOWING COMPANYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Carolina Land Company, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Sandy Island Corp. v. RagsdaleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Madison Ex Rel. Bryant v. Babcock CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Town of Summerville v. City of North CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.