Legal Opinion

Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 13, 1991No. 23399PublishedCited by 158 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

These actions were originally commenced by 271 plaintiffs claiming personal injury, property damage, and nuisance caused by pollution from a refinery operated by Respondent AT&T Nassau Metals Corporation (Nassau). Presently, 187 plaintiffs (Plaintiffs) remain in the case. They appeal orders granting Nassau’s motions for partial summary judgment and denying their motion to set aside prior partial summary judgments.

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The actions were commenced on July 11, 1985. Simultaneously with service of…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by158 opinions

  1. Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Madison Ex Rel. Bryant v. Babcock CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API