Legal Opinion

Moore v. Weinberg

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 20, 2007No. 4209PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

Joseph Moore (Moore) appeals the grant of summary judgment with regard to his claims of negligence, conversion, and civil conspiracy against M.M. Weinberg, Jr. and Weinberg and Brown, L.L.P. (collectively Weinberg). The trial court granted Weinberg’s summary judgment motion based on the doctrine of novation. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 1

FACTUAL!PROCE DURAL BACKGROUND

In the late 1980s, Clarence Wheeler and Joseph Moore entered into a business relationship where Wheeler placed video-poker machines in Moore’s service stations. Moore loaned Wheeler small amounts…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Regions Bank v. SchmauchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Singleton v. ShererCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. In re TD Bank, N.A.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  3. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Moore v. WeinbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Gauld v. O'SHAUGNESSY REALTY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API