Legal Opinion

Reynolds Construction Co. v. County of Twin Falls

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1968No. 10075PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

The plaintiffs, hereinafter referred to as appellants, are either corporations, partnerships, or individuals, all having businesses in Twin Falls County, Idaho, and all are real property owners therein. The defendants, hereinafter referred to as respondents, consist of the county of Twin Falls, a political subdivision of the state, and the members of the board of county commissioners of that county.

This action was instituted by appellants seeking injunctive relief, both temporary and permanent, to restrain construction by respondent county of a building designated as a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shields v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Rowe v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Scatuorchio v. Jersey City Incinerator AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  4. Safford v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. State v. RoderickIdaho Supreme Court · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Koch v. Canyon CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Asson v. City of BurleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Winther v. Village of WeippeIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Anderson v. Fayette County Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Bradbury v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API