Legal Opinion

Rowe v. City of Pocatello

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1950No. 7632PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

The plaintiff and appellant Rowe, of Providence, R. I., is engaged in business as “Rowe Craft Studio.” The other named plaintiffs are his agents. In pursuit of his business the plaintiff (without request or invitation so to do) goes from door to door of the residences of the city soliciting orders for enlargements of photographs. When an order is taken, the customer furnishes' a small photograph which is forwarded by the plaintiff to Kansas City, Missouri, where the enlargement is made. A print of the enlargement is returned to the order-taker, who submits it to the customer…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Sligh v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Omaechevarria v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Bacon v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Loomis v. City of HaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. O'BRYANIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Benninger v. DerifieldIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Pigg v. BrockmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API