Legal Opinion
Safford v. City of Lowell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 2, 1926PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.
The plaintiffs are taxpayers of the city of Lowell who bring their bill under G. L. c. 40, § 53, to restrain an expenditure of money by the city. The defendants, other than the city, are the mayor, treasurer, auditor, purchasing agent, and the members of the board of public service of Lowell, with one Legrand.
The cause was heard by a master and is reported to us for determination upon the pleadings, the report of the master and an interlocutory decree confirming the report. The facts set forth in the report of the master, so far as they are purely questions of fact, are not disputed.
Prior to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morse v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Burgess Sulphite Fibre Co. v. BroomfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Dooling v. City CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Merrill v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Cunningham v. Mayor of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Phipps Products Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- City of Lowell v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Gifford v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Muir Brothers Co. v. Sawyer Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Fluet v. McCabeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.