Legal Opinion

Shields v. City of Loveland

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 2, 1923No. 10,510PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

The plaintiffs in error brought suit against the city of Loveland to enjoin proceedings to establish a municipal electric light plant, and to declare void the ordinance No. 206, authorizing it. A demurrer to the bill was sustained and the cause was dismissed. The plaintiffs bring the case here for review..The bill shows: That, the city having expended $40,000 toward the establishment of an electric light plant, the city council on April 3, 1917, was, by the vote of the people, authorized to issue $83,000 of bonds to use in the construction of such a plant; that April 5, 1921, they were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. City of Valparaiso v. GardnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Van Kleeck v. RamerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  5. Anderson v. FullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1906

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Barnes v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Johnson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API