Legal Opinion

Koch v. Canyon County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2008No. 33707PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment holding that taxpayers of a political subdivision do not have standing to litigate whether the subdivision has incurred indebtedness or liability in violation of Article VIII, § 3, of the Idaho Constitution. We hold that the plaintiffs as taxpayers do have standing, but dismiss the appeal because the issue raised regarding the violation of the constitutional provision has become moot.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On March 27, 2006, Canyon County (County) leased from the Arthur J. and Grace L. Jerome Trust (Trust) a 23.87-acre parcel of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Coeur d'Alene Tribe v. Lawerence DenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Martin v. Camas County ex rel. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. LuteIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. Philip Morris, R.J. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. BarclayIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API