Legal Opinion

Winther v. Village of Weippe

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1967No. 9933PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Respondents (plaintiffs), by this declaratory judgment action, seek to have adjudged invalid as to them Ordinance No. 8, enacted February 26, 1965, by the village of Weippe, the ordinance reading,

“Not more than two (2) premises shall he licensed for the retail sale of beer for consumption on the premises within the limits of the Village.”

The trial court entered judgment adjudging the ordinance to be unconstitutional and void in its application to respondents, “as a deprivation of the property of the plaintiffs [respondents] without due process of law, and as an unreasonable…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  3. O'Connor v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. City of Lewiston v. MathewsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sierra Life Insurance v. GranataIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Tipco Corp., Inc. v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Coeur D'Alene Garbage Service v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sterling H. Nelson & Sons, Inc. v. BenderIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Carter v. State, Dept. of Health & WelfareIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API