Songstad v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
We here decide whether a voter who opposes a proposed countywide initiative may prevent proponents of that initiative from collecting the signatures needed to qualify it for the ballot based on a contention that the title and summary of the initiative prepared by a county counsel are not impartial or accurate.
I
Background
Before proponents of a countywide initiative may begin collecting signatures to qualify it for the ballot, the proponents must first file the text of the proposed initiative with the county elections official and request that a ballot “title and summary” be…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Alliance for a Better Downtown Millbrae v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Nestande v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Citizens for Jobs & the Economy v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Faulder v. Mendocino County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.