Legal Opinion

Nestande v. Watson

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 2003No. D040605PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AARON, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

Real parties in interest Allan Songstad et al. appeal from the trial court’s orders (1) denying their motion for attorney fees as to former Orange County Registrar of Voters, Roslyn Lever, and former Orange County Counsel, Laurence M. Watson; and (2) granting Lever and Watson’s motion to strike costs. Appellants contend that the trial court erred in finding they were not “opposing” or “prevailing” parties against “the county” within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure 1 sections 1021.5 and 1032. We affirm the trial court’s orders denying recovery of attorney…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Alford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Julian Union Elementary Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Rey v. Madera Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Ebbetts Pass Forest Watch v. Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Protect Our Water v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API