Legal Opinion
Hill v. Jones
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 4, 1975No. 7518DC180PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Judge.
G.S. 6-21.1 provides as follows:
“In any personal injury or property damage suit, . . . instituted in a court of record, where the judgment for recovery of damages is two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) or less, the presiding judge may, in his discretion, allow a reasonable attorney fee to the duly licensed attorney representing the litigant obtaining a judgment for damages in said suit, said attorney’s fee to be taxed as a part of the court costs.”
The statute creates an exception to the general rule that attorney’s fees are not allowable as part of the costs in civil actions. City…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Redevelopment Commission of Hendersonville v. HyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Redevelopment Commission of Winston-Salem v. WeathermanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Coastal Production Credit Ass'n v. Goodson Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- City Finance Co. of Goldsboro, Inc. v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Thorpe v. Perry-RiddickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Hillman v. United States Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Porterfield v. GoldkuhleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.