City of Charlotte v. McNeely
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
Appellants’ statement of case on appeal, assignments of error, and brief do not comply with the rules of the Appellate Division, and are rife with extraneous matter which serve only to multiply pages and increase the costs of this appeal. The only question which arises on this record is whether respondents are entitled to have certain of the items allowed by the clerk, and disallowed by the judge, taxed against City as a part of their recoverable costs in this proceeding. Despite respondents’ failure to comply with the rules of appellate procedure, because they are laymen…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re Housing Authority of City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- City of Charlotte v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Jeffress v. Town of GreenvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Horner v. Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Durham v. Rigsbee.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Wade v. WadeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Dailey v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Washington v. HortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Hoke County Board of Education v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.