Hicks v. Albertson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
“The general rule in this State is that, in the absence of statutory authority therefor, a court may not include an allowance of attorneys’ fees as part of the costs recoverable by the successful party to an action or proceeding.” In re King, 281 N.C. 533, 540, 189 S.E. 2d 158. “Except as so provided by statute, attorneys’ fees are not allowable.” Baxter v. Jones, 283 N.C. 327, 330, 196 S.E. 2d 193. See also, Bowman v. Chair Co., 271 N.C. 702, 157 S.E. 2d 378. An exception, recognized in the case of a party who, by his own effort and at his own expense, has preserved or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Horner v. Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Yates v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- In Re the Appeal of KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Hoskins v. HoskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Ge Betz, Inc. v. ConradCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Nucor Corp. v. General Bearing Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Washington v. HortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Coastal Production Credit Ass'n v. Goodson Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.