Legal Opinion

City Finance Co. of Goldsboro, Inc. v. Boykin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 21, 1987No. 864DC1355PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

I

Plaintiff argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion to set aside the judgment. We do not agree.

N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 60(b) provides that:

On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party . . . from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:(1) Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.

Plaintiff contends that the judgment should be set aside because any failure to prosecute this suit was due to the negligence of its attorney and not to any negligence on its own part. Although the negligence of an attorney is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Norton v. SawyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Hill v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Howard v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Burwell v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gray v. North Carolina Insurance UnderwritingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Garlock v. HensonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Shepard v. Bonita Vista Properties, LPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Eley v. Mid/East Acceptance Corp. of N.C., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Cotton v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API