Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Commission of Winston-Salem v. Weatherman
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 2, 1974No. 7421SC441PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
The Redevelopment Commission of Winston-Salem (hereinafter referred to as “petitioner”) brings forward five assignments of error.
First, petitioner assigns as error the trial court’s exclusion of evidence which would have shown the sale price of nearby land that was approximately 1/5 the size of the condemned land. Petitioner correctly points out the law in North Carolina regarding the admissibility of the sale price of allegedly comparable property. In State v. Johnson, 282 N.C. 1, 191 S.E. 2d 641 (1972) at page 21, the Court says: “Whether two properties are sufficiently…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Herndon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Redevelopment Commission of Hendersonville v. HyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Public Service Co. of North Carolina, Inc. v. LovinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Coastal Production Credit Ass'n v. Goodson Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Hill v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Leisnoi, Inc. v. Merdes & Merdes, P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
- S. J. Groves & Sons & Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.