Legal Opinion
People v. Sugarman
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 24, 2002No. B148414PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
Gary Allen Sugarman appeals a judgment after pleading guilty to driving under the influence with a prior (Veh. Code, §§ 23152, subd. (a), 23550.5), a felony, and admitting two prior felony convictions (§ 23152). We conclude that the highway patrol officer did not violate the Fourth Amendment by requiring Sugarman to take a blood test at a hospital after Sugarman frustrated the officer’s attempts to conduct a breath analyzer test. The trial court properly denied Sugarman’s motion to suppress the results of the blood test. We affirm.
Facts
California Highway Patrol Officer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Nelson v. City of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Hammer v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Mercer v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- RITSCHEL v. City of Fountain ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Espinoza v. ShiomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- People v. EsayianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.