Legal Opinion
Espinoza v. Shiomoto
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 2017No. E064252APublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, J.
I
INTRODUCTION
Bernice Espinoza appeals from the denial of her petition for writ of administrative mandate challenging the one-year suspension of her driver’s license by the Department of Motor Vehicles (Department). We conclude the record supports the trial court’s implied findings that (1) Espinoza was lawfully arrested on reasonable cause to believe she had been driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), (2) Espinoza refused to submit to and failed to complete a chemical test as required under the implied consent law, and (3) Espinoza was afforded a fair hearing before…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State of Maine v. Lyanne Lemeunier-FitzgeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
- Murphey v. Shiomoto, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. Gutierrez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Anderson v. Davidson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- 65282 Two Bunch Palms Building LLC v. Coastal Harvest II, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.