Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Esayian

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 23, 2003No. D041376PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.

Nicholas J. Esayian was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and, in accordance with the implied consent law (Veh. Code,1 §§ 23612, subd. (a) & 13384), he submitted to a blood test to determine his blood-alcohol content (BAC). Esayian was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) as a misdemeanor. In the trial court Esayian moved to suppress the evidence of the blood test on the ground that the phlebotomist who drew his blood was not authorized under the appropriate statute to draw blood for that purpose. Accordingly, Esayian argued…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Winston v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. JohnstonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. RITSCHEL v. City of Fountain ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API