People v. Harris
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.*—Defendant
Defendant Anthony A. Harris appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress, contending that the blood draw with which he cooperated after being arrested for driving under the influence (DUI) of drugs was nevertheless constitutionally invalid because police failed to obtain a warrant and because there was no applicable exception to the warrant requirement. He also argues that there was insufficient evidence that the blood draw was performed in a constitutionally reasonable manner. In the published portion of this opinion, we find that the blood draw was justified…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. MasonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. Arredondo, California Court of Appeal, 6th District2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.