Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1990No. 88-2045PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

Defendant first contends that the prosecutor failed to disclose or provide a tape-recording of his interview requested pursuant to Crim. R. 16, which tape was used to identify him and later offered in evidence on the issue of guilt.

Defendant’s contention raises the question of whether the prosecutor’s mistaken labeling of the tape of defendant’s interview with Deputy Sheriff Taylor on October 25, 1986 as having been made with Deputy Sheriff Rayburn on October 2,1986 resulted in prejudice to the defendant.

Crim. R. 16 provides in pertinent part:

“(B) Disclosure of evidence by the prosecuting…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. EdwardsOhio Supreme Court · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. IaconaOhio Supreme Court · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API