Legal Opinion
State v. Campbell
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1994No. 91-2137PublishedCited by 330 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
In this appeal, Campbell advances thirty propositions of law. For the reasons that follow, we affirm Campbell’s convictions and death sentence.
I
Waiver and Plain Error
Most of the issues Campbell now seeks to raise were not preserved by objection at trial. “It is a general rule that an appellate court will not consider any error which counsel for a party complaining of the trial court’s judgment could have called but did not call to the trial court’s attention at a time when such error could have been avoided or corrected by the trial court.” State v. Childs *41(1968), 14 Ohio St.2d 56, 43 O.O.2d…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by330 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
325 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.