Legal Opinion

State v. Garner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1995No. 94-1964PublishedCited by 643 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

Appellant has raised twenty-three propositions of law. We have reviewed each and, for the reasons stated below, we find that none justifies reversal of appellant’s conviction of the crimes of aggravated murder, aggravated burglary and aggravated arson. We have fulfilled our responsibilities to independently review the record, weigh the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors, and examine the proportionality of a sentence of death in this case. Upon full review of the record we affirm appellant’s convictions and death sentence.

I

Failure to Merge Specifications

The jury found…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by643 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001

638 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API