State v. Garner
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Appellant has raised twenty-three propositions of law. We have reviewed each and, for the reasons stated below, we find that none justifies reversal of appellant’s conviction of the crimes of aggravated murder, aggravated burglary and aggravated arson. We have fulfilled our responsibilities to independently review the record, weigh the aggravating circumstances against the mitigating factors, and examine the proportionality of a sentence of death in this case. Upon full review of the record we affirm appellant’s convictions and death sentence.
I
Failure to Merge Specifications
The jury found…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by643 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
638 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.