Legal Opinion

State v. Darmond

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2013No. 2012-0081 and 2012-0195PublishedCited by 321 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*344O’Neill, J.

{¶ 1} On the first day of a nonjury felony trial, during the testimony of the first witness, the trial court became aware that the state had failed to disclose to the defendant some evidence related to the case. The record is clear that the discovery violation was unintentional. The court noted that the undisclosed evidence “could be inculpatory or exculpatory,” but it never made a finding one way or the other. On motion by the defense, the court declared a mistrial and dismissed the charges with prejudice. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that the trial court had not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. City of Lakewood v. PapadelisOhio Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by321 opinions

  1. State v. ThorntonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. DillardOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. LeonhartOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. FryeOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. GrissomOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

316 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API