State v. Edwards

Appellant presents 12 assignments of error (hereinafter referred to as “propositions of law”).

I

In his fourth proposition of law, appellant contends that the trial court erred in finding that the state had presented sufficient evidence to show the commission of an *34aggravated robbery prior to the admission of the appellant’s confession to that offense.

The relevant rule of law is found in State v. Maranda (1916), 94 Ohio St. 364, 114 N. E. 1038, as follows:

“1. By the corpus delicti of a crime is meant the body or substance of the crime, included in which are usually two elements: 1. The act. 2.…