Wilkins v. RELIANCE EQUIPMENT CO.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
The questions on this appeal are controlled primarily by the Negotiable Instruments Law, 'Code 1940, Tit. 39, § 1 et seq. That is to say, whether a note executed by complainants to the order of Wayne E. Banks for $4,500, dated January 10, 1950, is a negotiable instrument and whether respondent is' a holder in due course.
The bill was filed by complainants, the makers of said note with a mortgage to secure it, to cancel the note and mortgage. It alleges that the consideration failed; that the nóte and mortgage were delivered conditionally and the condition was never fulfilled, and that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thorp v. MindemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Estate of Philpott v. PhilpottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Paepcke v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Niehuss v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Westlake v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Inland Mutual Insurance Company v. HightowerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Rhodes v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Marbury-Pattillo Construction Co. v. Bayside Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Rhodes v. TomlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.