Niehuss v. Ford
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This suit was begun at law by appellant in an action against J. R. Nettles for damages for cutting timber on a certain tract of land. Defendant paid the money into court, and suggested a claimant who, however, did not claim it, but E. O. Ford intervened as claimant. On motion of plaintiff, who is appellant here, the cause was removed to equity. Appellant then filed in the cause his bill in equity, and no issue is here made as to its sufficiency.
Appellant and Ford each claimed the timber under a common source, Fannie Ruffin. It is here argued as if the rights of the parties are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Austin v. BeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Boykin v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Goodlett v. HansellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Key v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Redwine v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Schoenvogel v. Venator Group Retail, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Rhodes v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Taylor v. First National Bank of TuskaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.